Find 2 Star Hotels in Wittevrouwenveld from SAR 174

"Beautiful place with amazing views great hiking trails. "

"The location of the property was great. The rooms were a decent size and clean."

"Lovely stay! Nestled in woods, spacious living and kitchen area. Rooms a bit tiny but sufficient. Would def recommend! Very well situated. "

"I liked the atmosphere and the very friendly host. The only thing I missed was the opportunity to get some coffee in the evening. A machine in the hallway would be great. The hotel itself was in a really good shape, fresh and clean. The breakfast was simple but of good quality (including good coffee!)"

"Excellent location near restaurants and patios "

"Hotel is fine. Concept is terrific, Hotel Smart BnB. However one fault was there was no hot water and issue was not corrected following communication with agent."

"Nice classy hotel boutique… the staff is amazing … great hotel for winter time. "

"See above It was dirty / very random interior/ tv didnt work/ no window "

"I don’t recommend this place at all! 3 star is for the River view. Had I known this is actually a youth hostel with some “comfort room” I wouldn’t have booked it at this price for my vacation. River view is not but we had to live with youngsters racing in hallway with big noises at 10:40pm every night! When we arrived on the rainy afternoon at about 2:30, the young guy at front desk didn’t check at all and didn’t dare to look at our eyes and told us check in has to be at 3pm! At 3 pm we were...

"Unique stay, perfect for families! "

"The location of this hotel is good, and it was clean, staff very nice, but it's a pretty run down old hotel, and our room was really small and terribly hot, even with the window open, and the fan running 24 hours, it was still really hot. Bathroom is tiny. breakfast doesn't open until 9AM, which is quite late if you want to get up and go somewhere, so we had to get breakfast at a different place. Also, note, Parking, even though the hotel wasn't full, there were no available parking and we had...